The world existed before we were born, and it will continue to exist after we die. Moreover, if we had never been born, it would not have missed us.
It is the father's duty to prepare children for the inevitable encounter with the indifferent and demanding reality full of other egos with their own interests.
But today, individuals have difficulty tearing themselves away from the narcissism of early childhood, when the mother was the child's entire world, satisfying all its needs without it having to earn it first. It only had to scream, and a nice warm breast full of the sweetest milk immediately came.
The deep current of political correctness is the rebellion against the father and his demands and admonitions. Individuals want to remain in their dreams of being the center of a loving world that loves them for who they are, a beautiful, lovely, and interesting person, and not for what he or she creates and accomplish. They talk mostly about rights, including human rights, women's rights, gay rights, ethnic rights, and so on - and less about duties.
1. A set of decent attitudes
Political correctness denotes a complex of attitudes that are considered by their adherents to be the only decent humane attitudes.
Irish women in Dublin demonstrate in favor of more Muslim immigrants. Photo Doherty - Stand.
These are positions such as anti-racism, which claims that people everywhere on the planet are the same, apart from skin color and other visible physical differences, feminism, which claims that women and men are completely the same apart from some insignificant bodily details. It is argued that it is a free existential choice whether one wants to define oneself as a man or a woman or something in between.
Political correctness argues for open borders and free immigration - since we are all fundamentally alike, and thus it is all the same porridge.
It is politically correct to believe that upbringing and education mean almost everything for the individual's abilities and personality, and hereditary abilities are of less importance.
2. Political correctness was born in American universities
Demonstration at American university. Photo American Renaissance.
Professor Howard S. Schwartz of Oakland University believes that the cradle of political correctness was in American universities, where it was born from the very beginning as a complex of "right" attitudes.
The term "political correctness" first entered public discourse in a 1990 New York Times article by Richard Bernstein. He described political correctness as follows: "--in academia and elsewhere, there is a strong belief that a complex of opinions about race, ecology, feminism, culture, and foreign policy defines some sort of "correct" attitude toward world problems, some sort of unofficial ideology of the universities."
Note that from the beginning, political correctness was about a set of attitudes and not simply about using correct words, such as "cream bun" instead of "negro bun", "person of african descent" instead of "negro", "socially distressed low-income areas" instead of "ghetto", and so on.
Typical T-shirt from the American university environment.
Bernstein continued: "Central to political correctness, which has its roots in the radicalism of the 1960s, is the belief that Western society has been dominated for centuries by what is often called "the white male power structure" or "patriarchal hegemony." A related belief is that everyone except white heterosexual men has suffered some form of oppression and been denied a cultural voice."
"But more than a serious term for a set of attitudes, "political correctness" has become a sarcastic term used by conservatives and classical liberals to describe what they see as a growing intolerance." - "a risk of being accused of the oft-repeated trinity of thought crimes: sexism, racism, and homophobia."
3. Does political correctness exist?
Political correctness is often used in everyday life to silence opponents.
If, in a discussion among friends or colleagues, you get too close to one of the key issues of correctness - such as by talking about the existence of human races, that intelligence is hereditary or that there are differences between women and men in addition to physical differences - you will often experience a dominant person in the group resolutely interrupting: "That's enough (name), I simply refuse to discuss such things", as if you have said something obscene. After that, no one wants to discuss the topic, and after a short silence, the group finds something else to talk about.
Different dog breeds have greater genetic similarity than different human breeds. Screenshot from Harald Eia's Brainwash
Advocates of political correctness reject the claim that they use a complex of "right" opinions - supported by unspoken threats of accusations of thought crimes and subsequent social ostracism - to silence opponents. According to their statements, there is no authorized "political correctness" that will turn all non-believers into heretics. They argue that their opinions are simply natural and modern human attitudes expressed by groups that were previously oppressed but now demand their natural place in social debate.
But the opinion complex exists. It is constantly enforced and defined in the media. When we turn on the TV news, we encounter the daily politically correct sunshine stories of well-integrated "refugees", watching cute unaccompanied refugee "children" playing soccer, and so on. But there is never anything about the long-term consequences of massive Muslim immigration. In a completely irresponsible manner, both TV channels carry daily scandals about US President Donald Trump - the head of state of Denmark's most important ally - probably because he is a white man and does not stand up to the politically correct demands of sensitivity and tolerance.
The message of the TV series 1864 is that nationalism is meaningless, and that you can only go wrong by loving your own people. Treacherous leaders confirm the evil of the old white men. Photo Frankfurter Algemeine.
All of DR's drama series have been politically correct projects. Former DR drama director Ingolf Gabold himself admitted this in an interview in Politiken: "I am political. And I have been political in the development of this drama," Gabold says and explains that the drama series "1864" was intended to direct spot at the Danish People's Party and "the entire isolation that lies in the Danish People's Party's very nationalistic belief in Denmark and the Danish".
In Nordjyske Stiftstidende, Michael Thestrup wrote: "The red-radical is so ingrained that it is unthinkable that DR would create a TV drama where the hero is a beautiful, intelligent, empathetic, independent entrepreneur and traditional liberal." And we can add that if, contrary to expectations, DR were to make such a series, the hero would with absolute certainty be a woman or a man of another ethnic origin. You simply cannot come up with a sympathetic white man in his prime.
In the TV series "Kr niken", all the women are strong women, and the men are either greedy capitalists or weak men. Thestrup continues: "In "Kr niken", the villain Kaj Holger is greedy, deceitful, brutal, dominant, manipulative, a traitor and conservative - while the hero, Palle From, is brave, romantic, self-sacrificing, committed, empathetic and a social-democrat." - "In Taxi, the disgusting and scheming capitalist, Herman, from the City Taxi, tries to take over our sympatic Krone Taxi." - "In Borgen, the moderates' beautiful (radical) heroine goes through fire and water to get Denmark back on the right (radical) track in immigration policy and even refuse becoming prime minister herself. Conversely, the Freedom Party (DF) is represented by an obese, unkempt, uneducated, rude and unappealing Svend ge Saltum (Ole Thestrup)."
Strong women and adult men, who break down sobbing are regular components of Scandinavian TV series.
The main character in the TV series Borgen is the strong and sympathetic Prime Minister Birgitte Nyborg, who relentlessly fights for a decent politically correct immigration policy, even if it costs her the position of Prime Minister. Photo: The Case for Global Film.
We encounter the political correctness when we take a TV channel cruise. There we will find that - unless it is old American films - most interviewers, studio hosts and international journalists will be women or men of other ethnic origin. If there is to be an interview with a representative of a company, scientific institution, university or the like, the representative will most often be a woman. It is simply not appropriate to put up with a white man in his prime.
4. The Psychological and Literary Roots of Political Correctness
It is easy to see that the attack on the white men is an attack on the father, who serves and works for the family. It is a rejection of all the father's admonitions about duty and moral rules. The politically correct rebels believe - or rather feel - that the white men have been on the scene for far too long, and that it is now time for their victims, teenagers, women, homosexuals and ethnic minorities, to enjoy the limelight.
The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit. - Wikipedia.
Professor Schwartz believes that the role of the father, which is largely identical to Freud's superego, was rejected around 1970-80, and the ego ideal of narcissistic psychology took its place. According to Freud, the ego ideal contains the fantasy of returning to the narcissism of early childhood, where the mother was the child's whole world, satisfying all its needs without it having to earn it first. It only had to scream, and immediately a nice warm breast full of the sweetest milk came.
In the United States, the cultural precursors to the attack on the father were the novel "The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit" from 1955 and some professional books on organization. The novel's protagonist is Tom Rath, a young veteran of World War II, who is trying to balance his marriage and family life with the demands of his career position at a New York TV network, while suffering from the after-effects of his participation in the war. It turns out that his girlfriend in Italy - from his stay there during the war - has had a son with him.
Everyone is pulling and pushing at him from all sides, and in the end he gives up the role of the husband and father, who is responsible for the family and society, and he settles for a "9 to 5" job.
Strangely enough, the attack on the father, who serves and works for the family, seems to manifest itself earlier in Denmark than in the USA. "The Song of Larsen" by Sven M ller Kristensen, the novels, "A Man Sits in a Tram" by Mogens Klitgaard and "The Missing Head Clerk" by Hans Scherfig were all written before the war in the late thirties, but only became seriously popular in the sixties, when the "youth rebellion" took off.
"A Man Sits in a Tram" by Mogens Klitgaard - Goodreads.com.
"The Song of Larsen" is about the average Danish man, named Larsen, who in the pursuit of material wealth loses the joy of life, and settle with a life of daily packed lunches in the clerk's usual anonymous gray suit. "It was supposed to be so good, and then it was actually bad", goes the song's refrain.
The novel "A Man Sits on a Tram" tells the story of the family man, the manufacturer Lundegaard, who gradually has all his dreams of a happy and prosperous life with his family shattered and sinks into alcohol and moral decay.
The most important attack on responsible and dutiful white men with power and authority was carried out by Hans Scherfig in "The Missing Head Clerk" from 1938. Theodor Amsted is a secretary in the Ministry of War - a powerful position - but secretly longs for freedom. When his former classmate from the Metropolitan School blows himself up on Amager F lled, Amsted makes it look as if he is the one who has died. He flees to Tisvildeleje, where he lives a free life, collects insects in jars and falls in platonic love. He is discovered, and ends up being sentenced to prison, where he finally finds true happiness in the peace and orderliness of prison - as he - according to Scherfig - has been raised to do according to the ideals of bourgeois society.
Ove Sprog e in the film version of Hans Scherfig's novel "The Missing Head Clerk", which is about a man with authority and power, who breaks down because of his inner weakness and longing to be free from responsibility - Photo from imusic.
These novels and songs present a picture of the father as one, who has adapted to the conditions of life and thereby sold himself for the purpose of achieving material wealth, and thereby lost his freedom. Many young people expressed that they did not think this material wealth was worth the sacrifice. In order to preserve the freedom that the father had lost, they refused to identify with him.
There is a peculiarity in the attack on white men that the reason for their power and importance is never mentioned.
White men are a small minority among all the men of the world, yet they are the ones who have created the entire Western civilization and all its institutions, which have been widely copied throughout the world. It is white men, who have invented electricity, the diesel engine, the automobile, the airplane, penicillin, artificial fertilizers, and so on and so forth - and brought all these inventions to Africa and Asia - to the great benefit of those countries. But the politically correct prefer to talk about social and technical development as something that happened all by itself - like flowers that sprout in the spring.
The young rebels do not understand that the father's sacrifice is not to achieve wealth for himself - but to support the family. Under the protection of their fathers and thanks to their wealth and tax payments, the youthful rebels can identify with revolutionary movements in developing countries, historical revolutionaries and other ethnic groups that are supposedly oppressed, and thereby maintain their sense of narcissistic omnipotence and importance. All their talk of revolution is a reality-distant fantasy - like that of children at play - that is simply to stage themselves as important heroes.
Autonomous or anti-fascists in action against the authorities. Like the Chinese Red Guards, they are discreetly supported by those in power and carefully covered by the mainstream media. In Denmark, it is the politically correct politicians who hold their hand and pay for their places to be. - Photo unknown origin.
In Western culture, for millennia, it has been the father's duty to protect the family from the cold and pedantic reality and at the same time raise the children so that they are ready to face it, when they reach the age of maturity and adulthood. The mother's role, on the other hand, has been to instill in them a deep sense of being loved, to give them a feeling of happiness that will last a lifetime and is the foundation of the drive for self-preservation, without which they would be lost.
In modern times, the demanding superego has been supplanted by the narcissistic ego ideal, which promises the satisfaction of the individual's needs without it being connected to performance, effort or work. In place of demands and preconditions for the individual, rights have taken the place, human rights, civil rights, refugee rights, women's rights, children's rights, and even animals have rights.
It is never mentioned that the flip side of rights is duties. For every right that some people have, there will be other people who have the duty to fulfill their demands or to secure the conditions for their realization - probably some white men.
The little child is fed and clothed by his parents simply because he is what he is, a lovely child. In the same way, modern narcissistic individuals demand rights and benefits simply because they are human.
Narcissus was a beautiful and arrogant Greek youth, who rejected the desperate advances of the nymph Ecco. As punishment, the gods condemned him to fall in love with his own reflection. Unable to love others, Narcissus stared at his reflection in the water day after day until he withered away and turned into a lily, which gave him his name, narcissus (daffodil).
A person suffering from severe narcissism feels that he is something very special and that it is quite natural for him to always be the center of attention of others - like a child. He is very concerned with symbols of his status in society, such as what title he has, how he lives and what car he drives, his clothing must be just right, which signals his prestige. He carries himself grandly to compensate for a deep feeling of emptiness and insecurity.
Some believe that narcissistic personality traits have become much more widespread in modern society than they were in the past. Perhaps because individuals have a more protected existence and are not exposed to the cruel and pedantic reality early on. Earlier generations, for example, could be apprenticed at the age of 14, being given water in the trousers and the like by older apprentices until they understood that they were not the center of the world, as they had been used to feel at their mother's house.
Painting by John William Waterhouse from 1903. Google Art Project.
We can trace the beginnings of political correctness back to the songs and literature of the thirties and sixties, but that does not explain why it appeared in earnest at this particular time. There must have been something stirring at that time, something new in society, new moods or emerging attitudes that inspired the poets to attack the father and the authorities.
We can guess that it was the nascent welfare state that gave individuals a sense of having a choice.
For example, the philosopher S ren Kierkegaard could make his existential choices and generally do whatever he wanted because he could rely on his father's large fortune.
Perhaps individuals in the fifties and sixties felt increasingly that they did not need to get on the hamster wheel so early. They wanted to be young, free and uncommitted for a while longer, and since they could rely on the almighty welfare state - as S ren Kirkegaard could rely on his father's fortune - they felt that it could not go completely wrong.
This explains why the rebellion against the father appeared in literature in Denmark before it appeared in literature in the United States, as the welfare state developed earlier in Denmark.
Photo from Woodstock Festival 1969. From Woodstock Photos.
In 1923, a group of philosophers founded a think tank that became known as the Frankfurt School, at the University of Frankfurt in Germany, Institute for Social Research. Its members included Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse.
Theodor Adorno wrote "The Authoritarian Personality," which was published in 1950, five years after the end of World War II. It was supposedly a psychological study that was supposed to identify the psychological roots of Nazism and fascism. But in reality, the book was an attack on the father and in general, it worked like a condemnation of middle-class fathers, who sacrificed themselves and worked for the family.
In the book, Adorno argued that harsh and punitive parents cause children to feel an enormous amount of repressed anger towards them, which will cause the children to idolize authority figures. Another important point in the book is that people with this authoritarian syndrome are predisposed to right-wing ideology.
Herbert Marcuse mobilized the sexual drive against Western civilization.
Sigmund Freud was the expert on people's innate sexual drive. As is well known, he argued that neuroses generally arise as a result of the suppression of impulses in the person's subconscious, which are prevented from reaching consciousness and instead manifest themselves in physical symptoms, such as paralysis, tensions, and depressions.
Herbert Marcuse speaks at a demonstration against capitalism on the Opera Square in Frankfurt, June 1972. Marcuse's message that one should live out all one's desires, feelings and inclinations became enormously popular in the 1970s. Photo Deutschlandfunk.
Freud wrote more than thirty books, including "Das Unbehagen in der Kultur", which in English is called "Civilization and Its Discontents". In the book he discussed the possibility that our civilization itself contains limitations that can provoke neuroses.
But Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School detached Freud's - probably true - considerations from their context and proclaimed that all civilization's limitations on sexuality should be broken down, one should live out all conceivable sexual inclinations without hesitation, and not let oneself be limited by customs and moral rules. In his book "Eros and Civilization" he proclaimed a "erotization of the whole personality". He claimed that his speculative theories were based on both Freud and Marx.
Emotionally, the politically correct rebels are based on the dream of remaining in the cheerful and non-committal state of childhood and youth for as long as possible, preferably for the rest of their lives. You should do whatever you want, it was said, and who wants to take on responsibility, duties and systematic work?
The fathers, the white men, represent the cruel reality that they so desperately try to avoid, and therefore it was a rebellion against him and his rules, admonitions and demands for responsibility, duties and systematic work - which is basically a rebellion against Freud's superego.
5. Political correctness exploits natural feelings
Supporters of the politically correct attitude complex will argue that their opinions are natural human opinions expressed by groups that were previously oppressed but are now demanding their rightful place in the social debate.
And indeed, they are right. It is in a way completely natural to live out all one's inclinations immediately without consideration or hesitation. It is very natural to yearn to preserve the uncommitted dreams of youth throughout one's life. But nature is one thing and civilization is another.
Brainwashing and manipulation. Drawing from renegadetribune.com.
It is easy to imagine that young people and voters are born innocent, and that politically correct attitudes have only become common because journalists, university lecturers, teachers and politicians manipulate and brainwash the rising generations and the easily influenced, only superficially interested voters.
A human mind is at birth a blank slate, "tabula rasa", wrote John Locke. But there is something already on the slate that cannot be erased. It is natural to long to remain in youth, the happy state between childhood and adulthood, forever, and young people will welcome such ideas that allow them to do just that.
But, as I said, nature is one thing and civilization is another. If we had not enforced the rules of a civilization - in our case, Western civilization - we would still be living in caves and mud huts and fighting endless battles against others because everyone wanted to live out their own inclinations.
It is not that journalists, teachers and educators simply take the blank slate and simply paint it over with rebellion against authority, anti-racism, anti-sexism, human responsibility for a coming climate catastrophe and the demand for comprehensive unconditional goodness towards everyone. They simply exploit the natural inclinations that were already on the slate.
The media is to a significant extent politically correct. They want to confirm their customers and users in their immature ideas about white men's - read the fatherss' - colonial oppression of other races, their exploitation of women and their ridicule of homosexuals and other sexual deviations. Simply because they want to sell newspapers and subscriptions. Just look at the conversion of Jyllands-Posten.
Universities lean toward political correctness because they want to attract students, which will give them increased funding. Politicians are politically correct because there are votes in it, and they want to be elected.
To a large extent, the manipulators are simply exploiting existing underlying, actually natural, drives that push the nation's development toward ever more suicidal political correctness.
Youth. Photo Pinterest.
We remember our youth, the wonderful time between childhood and adulthood, when we were free and independent, and not yet bound by responsibilities, duties and family. Everything that happened then is imprinted in our memory for the rest of our lives, our friends, all the crazy things we did, and all the fun we had, and all the girls we knew. All possibilities were open, we could choose to start careers in one direction or another or not at all, we could hang out with one girl or another. We could dream of philosophy, poetry, goodness and justice. It was simply freedom!
It was with a certain sadness that we committed ourselves to a certain career path. All systematic work involves contact with the ugly reality and contains a lot of routines that are very different from the dreams of our youth. The chosen girl, whom we married was certainly wonderful, but we still felt a suppressed sadness that we had now written off all the other possibilities. Our freedom had been curtailed.
Lines from the song "Forever Young" written by Frank Mertens, Marian Gold and Bernhard Lloyd. Sung by the German band Alphaville on their 1984 album.
It is quite clear that the youth rebellion, which has now taken the form of political correctness, was and is a rebellion against the white men, who represent the father, with all his admonitions about duties, moral rules and demands for real work and engagement in the pedantic reality.
When baby sparrows fly from the nest, they quickly find together in large flocks with other sparrows. In the same way, teenagers will be attracted to groups of their peers, and they will seek to find a place in the group hierarchy. They will not be very critical of the values ??that bind the group together. Without parental guidance, they will often just take the first group they meet.
This longing for freedom has probably always existed among young people, but in the past there were no economic opportunities for youth to fool around for years and have fun. Furthermore, the fathers, priests, teachers and all authorities at that time were aware of their moral responsibility and admonished, instilled and motivated the youth to love their family, their fatherland and their religion.
Feministisk demonstration i 60'erne. Photo Pinterest.
Feminism is another important driving force in political correctness. It is clearly directed at white men as the bearers of Western civilization.
I think that tendencies towards feminism have always existed. In the present, we have simply let the genie out of the bottle. When the ice age Cro-Magnon hunters returned to the cave with prey, they were cheered by the entire tribe. But some women must have felt a twinge of envy. They dreamed of pushing the men aside and going hunting for mammoths and woolly rhinos themselves. Sigmund Freud maintained throughout his life that women envy men because men have a penis.
But it is wrong to describe feminism only as a movement that expresses hatred and envy towards men. There are certainly hard-boiled lesbian feminists who hate men, but they are very few and not representative.
Feminism, on the other hand, is a tool that women use to challenge and manipulate men's emotions, so that they can thereby achieve increased affirmation of their beauty, charm and intelligence. They exploit men's love and affection to instill in them a form of guilt conscience, which can also be exploited to achieve other benefits.
If women can convince men that - for example - they should have as many leadership positions as men, or that men should go on maternity leave on an equal basis with women, and these events do not occur for natural reasons, then women have instilled in men a feeling that they owe women something, men have got a guilt conscience - and therefore women can expect men to make more effort to affirm them their love and affection - and thereby women will increase their emotional power and control.
Women's tendency to challenge and manipulate mature men's emotions is a natural drive that has always existed in human societies. Women, who were good at this, achieved more favorable marriages and had children, who, all else being equal, were more successful. This includes daughters, who may have inherited their mother's manipulative abilities.
You could say that the rebellion against the father and feminism came first, and these tendencies were simply amplified and exploited by manipulative politicians, journalists and educators. Others would argue that the youth, voters and women are born innocent, like John Locke's blank slate, but have been brainwashed by the manipulators.
Peter Pan en route to Neverland. Photo Pinterest.
Nature is one thing, and civilization is another. Not everything that is natural is good. Civilizations regulate the natural inclinations of the individuals, they moderate or suppress some natural drives and emphasize others.
In earlier times it was well known that not all of man's natural drives and desires are good. As it is written in Genesis: "The Lord smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will I curse the ground because of humans, even though every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done!"
And therefore in the past it was the duty of priests, teachers, and magistrates to counteract the innate harmful inclinations of man, by admonishing the youth, and to instill in them love for family, God, king, and country. Modern journalists, teachers, and politicians, on the other hand, have failed because of their zeal to become popular.
Main themes in the attitude complex of political correctness
6. Everyone has suffered from white male oppression
In modern politically correct society, groups do not compete so much with achievements as by seeking to surpass each other in stories of suffering and thus beg for sympathy and pity. Africans have their history of slavery, discrimination and colonialism. Muslims tell of crusades and imperialism. Jews have their history of the Holocaust and anti-Semitism. Feminist women tell of millennia of oppression, sexism, discrimination and rape. Homosexuals present the intolerance, homophobia and ridicule by white men. Children and young people - and especially their teachers - can tell of the unjust black school.
Ragged jeans prove the owner's right attitude and solidarity with the poor and oppressed. Photo True Religion.
If you have had the misfortune of being born as a white man, you have a slightly more difficult project, but it is far from hopeless. You can wear a top hat day and night, even in summer, to demonstrate sympathy and solidarity with the oppressed Africans. You can wear an baseball cap or steel in your face to show that even though you unfortunately have white skin and have been born with a penis, you do not belong to the group of evil white men in gray suits.
When the James Dean films were shown in cinemas in Denmark in the mid-sixties, it lasted only months before most young men were dressed in jeans and a white T-shirt with a round neck opening under their shirt. All their previous efforts to resemble the grown up men with ties, vests, trousers with press pleats and more disappeared like dew in the sun.
Since the end of the sixties, it has been the supposedly poor and oppressed, who have dictated fashion. Ragged jeans signal solidarity with the oppressed and resistance to those in power, the white men. Steel in the face signals that this person only follows his own "natural" impulses and is completely indifferent to the norms of civilization.
7. Racism is the most despicable thought crime
In the politically correct universe, human races do not exist. Other creatures on Earth, such as horses, cats, dogs and elephants, are clearly divided into races with different characteristics, but humans are an exception. Human races are a myth - it is believed - there are indeed people with different skin colors and physical features, but these nuances have nothing to do with other characteristics such as intelligence, aggressiveness and physical strength. Inside, "we are all humans", it is taught.
Inside we are all humans. Screenshot from Brainwash.
This is somewhat in contrast to the fact that the arch-villains of correctness are the white men, who are obviously believed to have some unfortunate qualities besides their whiteness.
But, we have all seen Olympic finals in the sprint distances. The field always consists almost entirely of American Negroes. It is quite clear that there is a race characterized by dark skin and great physical strength, which we can call American Negroes.
Jews constitute only 2-3% of the American population, but constitute 50% of the top 200 intellectuals, 40% of Nobel Prize winners, 20% of professors at top universities and 40% of partners in top law firms. It is said that the average IQ of American Jews is 112 against the average European level, which is 100. This shows that intelligence is largely hereditary.
Political correctness. Facebook.com/Image Blitz.
In these times of immigration, it is hard to avoid noticing that Middle Eastern types are more aggressive than others. Aggression depends on the amount of, among other things, the hormone testosterone, which is a biological innate characteristic - determined by genes. And aggressive people naturally prefer aggressive religions.
It is natural to love your own people, most people do. But if you are white, don't tell anyone. It will be labeled as a heinous thought crime, the blatant racism.
But, because you love your own people, you don't have to despise everyone else.
8. Sexism is racism's twin
Sexism is a twin to racism. If you acknowledge that human races exist and further attach certain characteristics to them, then you are racist. If you acknowledge that biological sexes exist and further attach certain characteristics to them - or at least to women - then you are sexist.
Jennifer struggles to keep her charms inside her bikini top. It's probably completely coincidental that she chose this particular cloth, when she walked out the door. But you can't blame a man for thinking only about sex when meeting such a woman, and not thinking about what she thinks about the political situation. But he should keep it to himself, because otherwise he has thought of a woman solely as a sex object, and that is sexism, a serious thought crime. Photo Yandex.
There are noble definitions of sexism in various media. For example, Wikipedia writes: "Sexism is prejudice or discrimination based on gender." It sounds elegant and objective, but it depends entirely on what is prejudice and what is truth. In practice, any comment, criticism, order or recommendation to a woman, that she does not like and that refers to or is based on her being of that gender, can be labeled as sexism. Jokes where the point is based on differences between the two genders will obviously be labeled as sexism.
Women cannot be guilty of sexism. They can any time exclaim "Oh men, they're just - - -" without thereby becoming guilty of this thought crime.
In most TV commercials that feature both a man and a woman, the woman is intelligent and enterprising and the man is a bit behind, such as Luffe and Sjane in the famous L'easy commercial or the two beer drivers in the latest Carlsberg TV commercial "Of course". If it had been the other way around, the man had been smart and the woman a bit stupid, both L'easy and Carlsberg would have long since ended up in court accused of sexism, or they would have been subjected to the shitstorm of the century.
It is the nature of men to desire women, and it is the nature of women to want to seduce and manipulate men by being as beautiful, intelligent, charming and sexy as they possibly can. It is not something that can be defined away by making it a thought crime, if you notice it. It is impossible to abstract from whether the person, you are facing is a man or a woman.
9.The demand for unconditional goodness
The overriding demand of political correctness is visible goodness at all costs. The pervasive and omnipresent desire of individuals to be good, or at least appear good, is the driving force behind many disastrous developments in modern society.
Politically correct demonstration in London 2016 in favor of increased immigration and increased adaptation to Muslim culture. Strictly speaking, Islam is a kind of religion and not a race, but that doesn't stop them from calling opponents racists and fascists. Photo: Stronger Unions.
The most tragic historical event in modern times is the endless Muslim immigration from Africa and the Middle East. It is easy to see that they - for the vast majority - do not want or are not able to adapt to Western society. They have a very high fertility rate, and when they become numerous enough, they will take over the whole country.
But if you want to reject all these "refugees", you cannot at the same time be good - at least not to the "refugees" - and therefore the politically correct rage against the opponents of immigration with accusations of inhumanity and racism. The logic seems to be that if they are not supporters of goodness - to the "refugees" - then they must be evil.
In the real world, you cannot be good to everyone. Almost every decision at all levels is good for some and less good for others. If you decide to reject "refugees" it is a pity for them, but good for our own descendants. If Muslim immigration is allowed, it is good for the Muslims but bad for our own descendants.
This irresponsible goodness leaves its destructive traces everywhere in society.
Third episode of TV2's series "Mosques behind the veil". Mohammad Fouad al-Barazi, leading imam in the Islamic Federation of Denmark, is interviewed with a hidden camera, he says: "Right now we are in a time where we are opening these countries. Now we have begun. There are Muslim communities all over Europe - Now we are 300,000 - " Photo Uriasposten.
Muslims will ultimately - when they become numerous enough - follow their Koran, which commands them to "cast fear into the hearts of the infidels", and to "cast terror into the hearts of the infidels, then strike their necks", which last must mean beheading, which is also very popular in the Middle East. The infidels include us - christian Danes.
The female priests of the People's Church are not even able to defend their religion with words. The church has developed into a pacifist movement that puts extensive irresponsible and unconditional goodness above everything else. Every New Year's Eve, they hold joint Christian-Muslim services in the country's most important churches.
Judges put goodness above justice. Criminals escape harsh punishments and deportation because it would be a pity for them and their many children. If they should end up in prison, it is a mere hotel stay where they can rest, have fun and exchange experiences with like-minded people.
Leadership without power is an impossible thing - but politically correct people generally regard power as evil, and those who exercise it as evil. The academic level in schools, colleges and universities is constantly falling because politicians and school principals shy away from leading and making demands - with subsequent consequences if the demands are not met. We should not go back to "The Black School", they say.
